Changes to Police Pension Approved

Posted by Bob on September 30, 2011 under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses unanimously authorized execution of changes to the Police Collective Bargaining Unit (“CBU”) pension that will place new hires in defined contribution pension plans.  After a year of “off-the-record” negotiations, an agreement was reached to make changes to the existing collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) that expires June 30, 2011.  An early retirement incentive package (“ERIP”) will be offered in conjunction with the changes, and can be viewed here.  The changes to the pension plan can be viewed here.

A summary of the changes is as follows:

  • All new employees to the Police CBU hired on or after September 1, 2011, will be eligible for the Borough’s defined contribution pension plan only.  The Borough shall contribute a maximum of three and 75/100ths (3.75%) percent of the employee’s “W-2″ wage (excluding private duty) to the plan.
  • Current employees shall double their existing contribution in the defined benefit pension plan from four (4%) percent to eight (8%) percent.
  • No further changes will be made to the defined benefit plan for existing employees through September 1, 2051.
  • The calculation for defined benefit pensions for existing employees shall be changed from the “last three (3) years” to the “best three (3) calendar years”.
  • Employees in the defined benefit plan currently can retire and earn a pension of seventy five (75%) percent of W-2 wages after twenty five (25) years of service.  This requirement remains the same under the changes.
  • Employees in the defined benefit plan could previously retire between twenty (20) years and twenty four (24) years of service at the following respective percentages of W-2 wages:  Twenty (20) years – sixty (60%) percent; twenty one (21) years – sixty two (62%) percent; twenty two (22) years – sixty four (64%) percent; twenty three (23) years – sixty six (66%) percent; and twenty four (24) years – sixty eight (68%) percent.  UNDER THE CHANGES, current employees in the defined benefit plan can retire between twenty (20) and twenty four (24) years of service at the following respective percentages of W-2 wages:  twenty (20) years – seventy (70%) percent; twenty one (21) years – seventy one (71%) percent; twenty two (22) years – seventy two (72%) percent; twenty three (23) years – seventy three (73%) percent; and twenty four (24) years – seventy four (74%) percent.
  • Up to eight (8) of ten (10) employees who are within five (5) years of twenty five (25) years of service, shall be offered a one (1) time opportunity to retire early at seventy five (75%) percent of W-2 earnings.  Employees electing to retire will be allowed to do so through December 31, 2012, based on seniority and agreement between the retiring officer and the Chief of Police.

An actuarial projection provides the costs and calculations associated with the pension changes, and can be viewed here. The study has been commonly referred to as a “bend” projection, showing when the changes to the pension plan will eventually reduce costs to the Borough.  The projection is that costs saved will outpace costs incurred by 2016.  Costs associated with the early retirement will depend on which officers and how many elect to retire under the ERIP, and will be provided upon request after those variables are known.

The most significant part and primary reason for these changes is the switch to defined contribution pensions for all new hires in the bargaining unit.  A defined contribution pension is similar to a 401 (k) plan commonly used in the private sector.  The cost savings in future years will be significant.  While there will be initial costs associated with retirement and accelerated pension payouts, the change will yield long-term fiscal stability for Borough taxpayers and a more sustainable government in terms of benefits paid to future employees.

The Police CBU will now become the sixth (6) and largest of Naugatuck’s seven (7) municipal bargaining units to move to defined contribution pension plans for new hires since 2009.  We would like to thank the representatives from the Police CBU for their many months of professional and respectful dialogue that were necessary to reach this deal.  Our police officers do an outstanding job of protecting and serving our community with limited resources and often in the midst of dangerous circumstances.

I would again like to thank Borough Labor Council Nick Grello, Director of Human Resources Jeannette Deschesnes and Comptroller Wayne McAllister as well as Borough Actuary Shirley Assantes for their efforts.  I also sincerely appreciate the collective vision of the members of the Board of Mayor and Burgesses to support this complex decision, the benefits of which will be realized in the long-term much more than the short-term.  We welcome any questions residents may have on the subject.

Clerical Bargaining Unit Agreement Approved

Posted by Bob on under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses unanimously authorized execution of a new collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between the Borough and the United Public Service Employees Union (“UPSEU”) clerical workers at a special meeting held on Thursday, September 29, 2011.  The agreement, which covers the period from July 1, 2011 (retroactively) through June 30, 2014, can be viewed here.  A summary of the fiscal analysis of the CBA prepared by Borough Comptroller Wayne McAllister can be viewed here in both Microsoft Excel and .pdf format.

The CBA is substantially similar to the agreement reached with the Visiting Nurse Association collective bargaining unit (“CBU”) in August, 2011.  A summary of the CBA is as follows:

Health Care:

The Borough achieved significant cost savings as a result of changes to health benefit packages offered to the members of the CBU.  Two choices are offered to members:  the traditional preferred provider organization or “PPO“; and the high deductible health plan or “HDHP”, which for the plan offered is a health savings account or “HSA”.  This CBU represents the first time that an HSA is being instituted to members of the CBA.  Highlights of the changes for each plan are as follows:

PPO

Beginning January 1, 2012, the premium cost share for members in enrolled in the PPO plan will increase from eight (8%) percent to nine (9%) percent.  Premium cost shares for members will increase to ten (10%) percent and eleven and 50/100ths (11.5%) percent respectively on July 1, 2012; and July 1, 2013.

HDHP or HSA

The Borough and the UPSEU Clerical CBU agreed to offer members an HSA plan that will result in savings. Beginning January 1, 2012, members can elect to enter an HSA plan without a premium cost share.  Premium cost shares for members will increase to four (4%) percent and six (6%) percent respectively January 1, 2013; and January 1, 2014.

More importantly, members enrolled in the HSA will gradually increase the deductible paid toward their respective plan in the following manner over the life of the agreement (plans are managed on the basis of calendar years rather than fiscal years):

  • Beginning January 1, 2012: members will pay twenty five (25%) percent of their deductible;
  • Beginning January 1, 2013: members will increase their portion of the deductible to thirty five (35%) percent; and
  • Beginning January 1, 2014: members will increase their portion of the deductible to fifty (50%) percent.

In addition, the Borough and the UPSEU Clerical CBU reached agreement to increase costs for plan designs (“co-pays”) for a variety of medical services over the three (3) year period as referenced in Article Seventeen (17) of the CBA.

The changes to the health benefits contained in the CBA represent significant savings to the Borough over the three (3) year period.  If no changes were made to the existing plan, the Borough would have incurred additional expenses (based on projected inflationary increases in health care costs) of approximately ONE HUNDRED FORTY FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE and 33/100THS ($144,255.33) DOLLARS.  Essentially that means, if the Borough did nothing on wages and kept the same health benefit plan, the cost of the overall agreement would increase by said amount, ONE HUNDRED FORTY FOUR THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE and 33/100THS ($144,255.33) DOLLARS.   Instead, health benefits will cost approximately NINETY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE and 17/100THS ($90,585.17) DOLLARS, representing a savings of FIFTY THREE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SEVENTY and 16/100THS ($53,670.16) DOLLARS in health care costs over the three (3) years period.

Pensions

No changes were made to the pension as an agreement was reached in a previous agreement to provide defined contribution pension plans to new members of the CBU.

Wages:

Members of the CBU will received increases in general wages for the following years at the following rates:

  • 2011-2012:  Two and 15/100ths (2.15%) percent;
  • 2012-2013:  Two and 15/100ths (2.15%) percent; and
  • 2013-2014:  Two and 20/100ths (2.20%) percent.

The total increase in cost for the three (3) year period for wages is ONE HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY SIX and 41/100THS ($155,996.41) DOLLARS for approximately thirty seven (37) employees.

Other Changes

The Borough and the UPSEU Clerical CBU also agreed to redefine the grade and step schedule outlined in Appendix A of the CBA.  The previous agreement had eight steps, but members did not move along the schedule.  The new schedule reduces movement to three (3) steps: an initial step for new hires; a main step and a reclassification step when additional, substantive duties are appropriately assigned.  In addition, the new CBA contains multiple language revisions that make for a better document.

Our administration would like to thank the members of the UPSEU Clerical CBU, particularly the representatives on the negotiating team, for respectful and productive dialogue.  Those involved in the negotiations participated in many meetings and discussed several complex topics that ultimately produced an agreement that benefits the employees as well as Borough taxpayers.  The members of the UPSEU Clerical CBU perform numerous duties essential to the operation of Borough government across multiple departments.  While their wages are relatively lower than many other Borough employees, UPSEU members continuously demonstrate a tremendous work ethic while providing professional and courteous service to Naugatuck residents and businesses.

We would also like to thank Borough labor counsel Nick Grello, insurance broker Rob Fitzpatrick, Human Resource Director Jeannette Deschesnes and Comptroller Wayne McAllister for their sound advice and diligence throughout the process.  The agreement, which combines modest pay increases with significant health care savings, represents another step toward a more sustainable local government.

Naugatuck High School Renovation Question and Answers

Posted by Bob on September 27, 2011 under Daily Blogs, Naugatuck High School Renovation | Be the First to Comment

Naugatuck voters will be asked to vote on a bond authorization to completely renovate Naugatuck High School (“NHS”) on November 8, 2011.  Undoubtedly, residents have many questions regarding the project.  The following is list of questions and answers that attempts to provide as much information as possible about the project:

What is the purpose of the NHS Renovate-as-New Project?

The purpose of the project is to completely renovate NHS to modern educational and architectural standards.  A 2007 Kaestle Boos Associates, Inc. study described deficiencies in the core infrastructure at the high school. The study referenced numerous settlement cracks, masonry and joint deficiencies and support issues that were in need of address.  In addition to the items referenced in the Kaestle Boos analysis, several other areas of the high school will need to be repaired in the coming years.  Health, safety, building and Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”) accessibility code compliance improvements are needed throughout the building, including but not limited to classrooms, corridors, locker rooms and the auditorium. Many windows and frames need to be replaced with the corresponding paint removal. Poorly drained athletic and marching band fields and spectators walking on the same pool deck with swimmers have been problems for many years.  The “Renovate-as-New” Project would completely repair and refurbish all aspects of NHS.

What is the difference between Renovate-as-New and New Construction?

The concept of Renovate-as-New is to completely refurbish an existing school facility to modern standards and codes. The process is an alternative, in this case less expensive, to building a new school at the same or different site.  The State of Connecticut recently reduced Naugatuck’s reimbursement rate for new school construction from seventy five (75%) percent to sixty five (65%) percent.  The Borough’s reimbursement rate for renovation projects remains seventy five (75%) percent.

All systems have to be designed and certified for a twenty (20) year, life cycle to qualify for a “Renovate-as-New” project. In addition, the legislation that governs the “Renovate-as-New” process requires that a municipality and/or school district prove that the renovation is less expensive than building a new facility in order to qualify for full reimbursement.

What is the cost of the NHS Renovate-as-New Project?

The Joint Board of Finance and Mayor and Burgesses (“Joint Boards”) authorized the Borough to bond EIGHTY MILLION NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO and 00/100THS  ($80,983,582.00) DOLLARS.  That would be the maximum amount that a Building Committee could spend on the project without further authorization from the Joint Boards.  The Borough’s cost, after state reimbursement, would range from TWENTY FOUR MILLION NINE HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWO and 38/100THS ($24,934,702.38) DOLLARS and THIRTY SEVEN MILLION FOUR HUNDRED SIXTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY TWO and 09/100THS ($37,416,942.09) DOLLARS.

What is state reimbursement?

The State of Connecticut reimburses municipalities a certain percentage for costs associated with school building projects.  The reimbursement rates for specific towns are determined by a formula based on various socio-economic indicators.  The state does not reimbursement every repair, renovation and/or construction at the same rate.  Some costs are not eligible for reimbursement while others only received a portion of the maximum reimbursement percentage.  The state also reduces reimbursement rates if a facility is larger, based on square footage and population projections, than state guidelines.  Towns may request a waiver from the reduction in full state reimbursement if square footage limits exceed student projections.

Why is there a big fluctuation between the Borough’s local portion of the cost?

NHS current footprint exceeds the State of Connecticut’s square footage guidelines of approximately 236,635 square feet based on student population projections over the next eight (8) years.  The structures at NHS total about 304,181 square feet.  This would reduce Naugatuck’s reimbursement rate from seventy five (75%) percent to approximately fifty eight (58%) percent.  Naugatuck would have to seek a waiver of that reduction from state officials.  A reduction in state reimbursement would also apply if the Borough constructed a new high school of similar size.  A school construction and/or renovation project must be approved by public referendum before a municipality can apply for a waiver from any deviation from state square footage requirements.

How long would the NHS Renovate-as-New Project take to complete?

If the bond is authorized at the November 8, 2011, referendum, it is estimated that construction would not begin until the Fall of 2012.  Construction is scheduled to be completed by the Fall of 2015.

How are payments on bonds made?

The permanent construction bonds would not become due and payable until the project is complete.

How would the project be financed during construction?

The project would be financed during the construction phase using bond anticipation notes.  It it anticipated that the bond anticipation notes will be structured so that primarily interest will be paid during the construction phase of the project.

What is a bond anticipation note?

According to Investopedia.com, a bond anticipation note is “a short-term interest bearing security issued in the anticipation of larger future bond issues.”  Further explanation states that “Bond anticipation notes are smaller, short-term bonds issued by governments and corporations.  Knowing that the proceeds of the larger future issue will cover the anticipation notes, the issuing bodies use the notes as short-term financing.”  (www.investopedia.com)

How much more in taxes will this mean to the average homeowner?

If the referendum is approved, the Borough’s obligations to repay the bonds will increase gradually throughout the construction cycle.  While it is impossible to know all the other factors associated that determine the Borough’s mill rate, the following documents provide an analysis of the costs associated with the NHS renovation project:

Debt Management Plan – NHS Project Plan Costs;

Existing and Proposed Debt Service / Debt Management Plan – NHS Renovation Project; and

Existing and Proposed Debt Service / Annual Change in Debt Service including NHS Renovation Project.

What would the interest rates associated with the bond financing?

The current interest rates for the municipal bonds is approximately three and one half (3 1/2%) percent.  The actual interest rate on the project would not be fixed until construction is completed.

What is the Borough of Naugatuck’s bond rating?

The Borough of Naugatuck’s municipal bond rating for general obligation bonds is currently AA-.  Both Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s upgraded the Borough’s bond rating from A+ to AA- in 2010.  The Standard and Poor’s 2010 Summary for the Borough of Naugatuck’s general obligation bonds can be viewed here.

What is a municipal bond rating?

A municipal bond rating assesses the credit worthiness of a municipality.  It is commonly compared as the municipal equivalent of a personal credit score.

What is the current status of the Borough’s bonded indebtedness?

The Borough’s bonded indebtedness is relatively low at the current time.  A list of outstanding obligations and their respective maturity date can be viewed here.

Would NHS remain operational during the construction?

Yes.  Construction will be completed in phases.  If the bond is authorized at the November 8, 2011, referendum, NHS will remain a functioning high school during construction. The Building Committee, design team, construction manager and school officials will jointly discuss and develop a plan so the school can function with minimal disruption during the renovations.  Flexible space will allow administration to offer the same curriculum that the current schedule provides. Fall athletics would likely be disrupted for one (1) season while athletic fields are being repaired and renovated. Previous renovations to fields in the late 1980′s relocated certain Fall sports competitions to Breen South and Municipal Stadium in Waterbury.  An exact plan for the one (1) Fall season will be determined.

Would there be shortened schedules during the renovation?

No.  NHS will remain a functioning high school on full schedule during construction.

Will there be enough space in NHS to accommodate the renovation and operate on full schedule?

Yes.  There will be sufficient flexibility with regard to space to accommodate the renovation and operate on full schedule.

Would freshman sports be eliminated?

No.  Freshman sports will not be eliminated during the renovation period.  Freshman sports were not eliminated during the previous renovation to the athletic fields which took place in the late 1980′s.

Would portable classrooms be used?

No.  Portable classrooms will not be needed during the renovation.  NHS will remain a functioning high school during construction.  Adequate space currently exists and will remain during the renovation as a result of flexible space.

What are the educational benefits of the Renovate-as-New Project?

Educational specifications have been drafted over the course of several months. Former administrator Carl Trombley was commissioned to lead a team of educational officials in creating specifications for a building most conducive to a twenty-first (21st) century, learning facility.  Many of the classrooms do not have the technological infrastructure to support large-scale wireless communications and “smart-board” technology.  Many still use the traditional blackboards. A complete renovation would upgrade the technology itself within classrooms and common learning areas.  The new classrooms will provide the capacity to allow computer and online learning to flourish as technology advances.  In addition, there are plans to install such learning environments as a greenhouse, a child-development center and upgraded music and drama facilities in various locations in the building.

What will happen to recently completed upgrades at NHS?

Certain repairs and upgrades have been made to NHS during recent years such as the installation of solar panels on the roof, addition to the cafeteria, renovated science labs and restoration of the auditorium.  Any such repairs that have been made will not be redone during the renovation.  Any recently repaired and/or new item will remain intact provided there is code compliance.  Recently renovated science (biology) labs and the cafeteria comply with applicable codes.  There may be additional work required to facilitate new mechanical, electrical and sprinkler systems.  See individual items below.

Did we not just install a new roof at NHS with solar panels?

Yes.  The solar panels are functioning well and returning power to the grid.  The solar panels will remain and very little work is needed on the NHS roof that is not related to chimneys and/or the connection to the masonry.  The roof warranty currently in place will need to be extended.  A waiver may be sought due to the fact that the roof and corresponding solar panels were only installed a few years ago.

Did we not just renovate the Davis Auditorium?

Yes, to a degree.  Local, state and community dollars helped to replace the seats and some floor tiles in the auditorium and renovate the adjacent restrooms.  All of these recent repairs and/or additions will remain.  There are still, however, several issues that were not address due to cost.  The auditorium does not presently comply with Americans with Disability (“ADA”) code and egress requirements.  In order to qualify a Renovate-as-New project, an entire school must comply with all the applicable code requirements.  It is planned that the auditorium layout will change and its seating capacity will be reduced.  Recently installing seating will be removed and re-installed in a new layout.  It is planned that a new sprinkler system will be installed.  It is also planned that the state sound system and theatrical lighting will be refurbished.

How will the proposed renovation impact the seating capacity of the Davis Auditorium?
If the referendum is approved, it is anticipated that the seating capacity of the Davis Auditorium will be reduced from approximately nine hundred fifty (950) to approximately six hundred seventy four (674), which will include four (4) handicapped-accessible seats.

Did we not just renovate new science labs?

Yes.  Certain science labs that were renovated will not need to be replaced.  Chemistry labs have not been recently renovated.

Did we not just complete an addition to the cafeteria?

Yes.  The recent addition to the cafeteria meets applicable codes.  Some changes have been requested pursuant to the educational specifications, but it is anticipated that most of the work recently completed will remain.

Did we not just add new lockers to the Sophomore (Goodyear) House?

Yes.  New lockers that have been recently installed will remain and/or be reused once the renovation project is completed.

Will the houses be reconfigured?

Educational specifications were drafted by school administrators and approved by the Board of Education.  The educational specifications can be viewed here.  While certain classrooms and disciplines will be relocated into more convenient and educationally consistent areas, the three (3) main houses – Freshman (Castle), Sophomore (Goodyear) and Junior/Senior (Judd) will remain.

Will the names of various components of NHS change?

No.  All current names shall be retained.  For example: The Davis Auditorium will remain the Davis Auditorium and the Mariano Gym will remain the Mariano Gym.

Will there be additional parking spaces at NHS?

No.  The amount of land at NHS will not change and there will be no additional parking spaces of any significance added.

Will there be better traffic flow?

Yes.  A bus loop will be created that should allow buses to exit the building in less than five (5) minutes.  A visitor pick-up / drop-off area has been proposed with separate access points from the bus loop.  A second and safe means of vehicular egress is proposed for the Eastern exit.

Is there any asbestos remaining in NHS?

All areas of NHS will be tested and all hazardous material identified, including asbestos, will be removed.

Will sprinkler systems be installed and/or updated if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  If the referendum is approved, fire sprinkler systems will be installed and/or brought to applicable codes in all areas of the building structure.

Will air conditioning be installed if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Air conditioning currently exists in the Sophomore (Goodyear) House, Freshman (Castle) House, Resource Center and other isolated areas of NHS.  The Building Committee will investigate installing air conditioning to all areas of NHS.  The educational specifications approved by the Board of Education include the installation of air conditioning to all structural areas of NHS.  The addition of air conditioning will be considered as an alternate and incorporated depending on the bid results.

Will new windows be installed if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  New, insulated glass windows will be installed as well as the frames that support the windows.

Will renovations improve energy efficiency if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  State of Connecticut school facility requirements mandate that all projects exceeding FIVE MILLION and 00/100THS ($5,000,000.00) DOLLARS comply with “high performance” building standards.  Part of such compliance requirements includes installation of energy efficiency systems throughout a structure as well as the use of certain recycled materials.

Will any changes be made to the NHS Resource Center if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  The NHS Resource Center is relatively large for a modern media facility.  If the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum, the square footage of the Resource Center would be reduced and excess space will be made available for light-appropriate art classrooms.

Are there any other new features that would be created if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  It is anticipated that if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum, an outdoor greenhouse, child development area with play-scape, natatorium (swimming observatory area), new administrative offices, security features, state-of-the-art auditorium, state-of-the art music rooms and fitness center/dance studio/weight room will be created using new and/or renovated space.

Is it possible to install generators at NHS that would allow for better sheltering during emergency situations if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  If the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum, the Building Committee will investigate if generator power can be installed to certain areas of NHS.  While it might be impractical and cost-prohibitive to provide alternative power to all of NHS, it is anticipated that the Building Committee will research if certain areas could be equipped with generator power to increase sheltering options.  It is anticipated that the Building Committee will also investigate possible, alternative financing sources for generator power from emergency management agencies on the state and federal level.

Will security be addressed at NHS?

Yes.  The proposed renovation includes relocating the main offices from the back of the building to the front by enclosing the patio.  The main entrance and all other access points of entry and exit will be equipped with modern means of security verification technology.

Has the possibility of building a new high school been researched?

Yes.  The Long Term School Facility Planning Committee researched multiple scenarios involving a new high school.  It was determined that building a new high school was not a good option for the following reasons: (i) cost; (ii) the lack of available land that was did not have the potential to generate commercial tax revenue; and (iii) building a new high school with the current square footage of NHS would exceed state guidelines and likely reduce the reimbursement rate to the Borough.  The following are the cost projections for five (5) different options:

What is the Long Term School Facility Planning Committee?

The Long Term School Facility Planning Committee (“LTSFPC”) is an ad-hoc group appointed by the Board of Mayor and Burgesses.  The Committee’s charge is to formulate a facilities plan for the Naugatuck School District that can be implemented by the year 2025.  The Mission Statement of the LTSFPC can be viewed here.  In addition to the recommendations made regarding the NHS renovations, the LTSFPC is researching options for the Kindergarten through Eight Grade (“K-8″) portion of Naugatuck’s School District.  The members of the LTSFPC can be viewed here.

Why did the LTSFPC recommend renovations to NHS before completing the entire plan for the K-8 portion of the District?

The LTSFPC researched the significant needs required at NHS.  After determining that building a new high school was not the best option, the LTSFPC researched the renovate-as-new concept.  It was ultimately decided that pursuing a renovation of NHS was the appropriate beginning of implementing improvements to the entire district.

What would it cost to just complete needed structural repairs and code compliance?

Unless ignoring the asset is an option, work will need to be done to maintain NHS.  Numerous settlement cracks, masonry and joint deficiencies and support issues need to be repaired.  Health, safety, building and Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”) accessibility code compliance improvements are needed throughout the building, including but not limited to classrooms, corridors, locker rooms and the auditorium. Many windows and frames need to be replaced with the corresponding paint removal.  It is estimated that the cost of such basic repairs could costs approximately FORTY SIX MILLION and 00/100THS ($46,000,000.00) DOLLARS.  It is estimated that the cost to the Borough for such repairs would be approximately TWENTY TWO MILLION and 00/100THS ($22,000,000.00) DOLLARS as many of these items are not reimbursed at the highest level if at all.

Can the Borough choose not to do all of the proposed repairs and just concentrate on the basics?

Yes.  Ultimately the scope of the repairs will be determined by the Building Committee.  If renovate-as-new project status is granted, a municipality is basically telling the State of Connecticut that the renovated facility is likely to function as an educational institution for the next twenty (20) years.  Pursuant to that requirement, a Renovate-as-New project must ensure that a facility meets compliance standards for ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards.  If a choice is made to exclude particular items during the renovate-as-new process, a town may not return within a twenty (20) year period and receive any state reimbursement for such a repair and/or addition.  Therefore if a particular portion of work is not included in the renovation, Naugatuck would be required to pay for such a repair in the future without any state reimbursement for a twenty (20) year period.

Can the Borough choose to complete the renovate-as-new project without including the renovations to the athletic fields?

The Borough can choose to complete a Renovate-as-New project without including certain aspects of the currently-proposed project provided that it meets compliance standards for ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards.  If the athletic fields are excluded, however, the Borough could not complete future repairs to said fields and receive any state reimbursement within the next twenty (20) years.

Can the Borough choose to complete the renovate-as-new project without including the renovations to the auditorium?

The Borough can choose to complete a Renovate-as-New project without including certain aspects of the currently-proposed project provided that it meets compliance standards for ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards.  If the auditorium is excluded, however, the Borough could not complete future repairs to said auditorium and receive any state reimbursement within the next twenty (20) years.  Because the auditorium does not currently meet ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards, the Borough would need to address such issues to be granted Renovate-as-New status is granted.

Can the Borough choose to complete the renovate-as-new project without including the renovations to the pool?

The Borough can choose to complete a Renovate-as-New project without including certain aspects of the currently-proposed project provided that it meets compliance standards for ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards.  If the pool/natatorium is excluded, however, the Borough could not complete future repairs to said auditorium and receive any state reimbursement within the next twenty (20) years.  Because the auditorium does not currently meet ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards and requires new sprinkler systems, the Borough would need to address such issues to be granted Renovate-as-New status is granted.

Can the Borough choose to complete the renovate-as-new project without including the renovations to the locker rooms?

Yes.  If the locker rooms are excluded, however, the Borough could not complete future repairs to said locker rooms and receive any state reimbursement within the next twenty (20) years.  If no locker room additions are done, then existing locker spaces must be brought to compliance with ADA accessibility and ingress/egress as well as “High Performance” building standards and will require new sprinkler systems so that the project can be designated with Renovate-as-New status.

Why are the Board of Education offices being relocated to NHS?

There are multiple reasons.  Relocation the Board of Education (“BoE”) administrative office will help reduce the amount of square footage available at NHS that is over the state guidelines.  The current footprint of NHS is approximately three hundred four thousand one hundred eighty one (304,181 ft 2) square feet, while state guidelines recommend a school of approximately two hundred thirty six thousand six hundred thirty five (236,635 ft 2) square feet based on Naugatuck’s population projections over the next eight (8) years.  The state would reimburse Naugatuck approximately thirty seven and one half (37.5%) percent for renovations associated with relocating the BoE offices to NHS.   In addition, the Tuttle building presents logistical and technological obstacles to conducting modern office functions.  Lastly, relocating the BoE offices to NHS would improve communication between administrative staff, particularly with regard to special education.

If the BoE offices are relocated to NHS, what would happen to the Tuttle Building?

The Long Term School Facility Planning Committee has been charged with recommending a suitable re-purpose for any closed educational facility.  Roof repairs are currently needed at Tuttle.  The Tuttle property itself is currently restricted by deed, but could likely serve another municipal and/or public use.  The cost of any repairs needed could vary depending on how closely the Borough would like to replicate the original condition of the building.

If Naugatuck voters approve the bond authorization at referendum, who would oversee the design and construction of the renovations?

A Building Committee has been appointed by the Board of Mayor and Burgesses to oversee the design and construction of the NHS renovations.  The duties of the Building Committee would include but not be limited to: procuring an architectural design firm; overseeing the design of the project; determining the scope of the project; oversee the procurement of a construction manager; ensure educational needs are included in the design and implemented during construction; manage the budget with Borough Finance staff; and determine any change orders to the original design.

Who is on the Building Committee?

The Building Committee is comprised of the five (5) standing members of the Borough’s Five (5) Year Capital Committee and two (2) representatives representing education in our District.  The members are as follows:

  • Robert Neth, Chair – Burgess and Chair of Five (5) Year Capital Committee;
  • Cynthia Herb – Member of Five (5) Year Capital Committee and former Chair of the Board of Finance;
  • Kevin Knowles – Member of the Five (5) Year Capital Committee; Former State Representative and Former Deputy Mayor;
  • Raymond Lennon – Member of the Five (5) Year Capital Committee and Former Chair of the Board of Finance;
  • Wayne McAllister – Member of the Five (5) Year Capital Committee, Borough Comptroller and BoE Business Manager;
  • Charles Marenghi – Borough Educator and Vice-President of the Naugatuck Teachers League;
  • Janice Saam – Principal of Naugatuck High School.

All members of the Building Committee are Naugatuck residents.

Would local residents have the opportunity to work on the project?

Yes.  State and federal law dictate wage guidelines on large public projects, including school constructions and renovations. The Building Committee would have the option to consider any additional options that would provide preference to local workers.

How many jobs will be created by the proposed Renovate-as-New project?

Typically a project of the size and magnitude proposed will create between one hundred (100) and one hundred fifty (150) jobs.

What is the Five (5) Year Capital Committee?

The Five (5) Year Capital Committee is the committee appointed by the Board of Mayor and Burgesses to oversee bond projects in the Borough.  The Borough’s bond counsel provides professional assistance and instruction in compliance with legal requirements and proper accounting procedures.

Who is the architectural firm that has completed the initial services required to proceed with the NHS Renovate-as-New Project?

Kaestle Boos Associates, Inc.

How will the architectural firm be selected if the referendum is approved?

The Building Committee will issue a request for qualifications (“RFQ”) seeking an architectural firm for the entire project.

What are the renovations that would not be eligible for full, state reimbursement (75%) even if a waiver of the square footage requirements is successful?

The following project components are not eligible for full, state reimbursement (with maximum reimbursement levels):

  • Athletic Field Reconstruction (only 37.5% of approximately $3,177,057.00);
  • Synthetic Surface (0.0% of approximately $778,455.00);
  • Pool Natatorium (only 37.5% of approximately $3,094,816.00);
  • Portion of Indirect Costs (0.0% of approximately $1,381,062.00).

What are “Indirect Costs”?

According to the architects itemized projections, Indirect Costs are as follows:  Bond expenses, Survey/Design, Geo Tech Services, Third (3rd) Party Structural Review; Moving and Storage; Zoning and Wetlands; Traffic Study; Abatement Testing/Inspection; Construction Testing; Printing/Advertising; Commissioning; Final Cleaning; Miscellaneous; Builders Risk; Legal Fees; Furniture and Technology; and Architecture and Engineering Fees.

Why is a synthetic grass surface needed for field reconstruction?

Most high schools being built in Connecticut include at least one (1) synthetic grass surface for football and soccer use (Watertown most recently). Some high schools have installed synthetic grass surfaces completely separate from school construction and/or renovations (Wolcott, Pomperaug and Cheshire).  Synthetic grass surfaces allow constant play regardless of weather conditions and reduce the need for pesticides, fertilizer and water.  A quality and consistent playing surface at NHS will permit procuring regional and state events which produce both direct revenue to the school district and indirect revenue to the community.  It is anticipated that the installation of a synthetic surface will allow more frequent use by youth soccer, football and marching band groups.

Where would the synthetic surface be?

The synthetic grass field would be installed at the current location of the football field.  Both soccer and football games would be played on the upper field.  Handicapped-accessible seating would be installed to the grandstand, and visitor bleachers enhanced.  It is anticipated that an eight (8) lane track would be constructed around the soccer/football field.

Where would the baseball and softball fields be located?

The baseball field would be relocated to the Western side of the lower field (current soccer field) with home plate located approximately near the old Western ticket booth (that formerly served Mountview Plaza Traffic).  The new softball field would be installed at the Eastern portion of the lower field (current soccer field), with home plate located outside of the Southern end of the tennis courts.  Both the baseball and softball fields would have natural grass and clay surfaces.  It is anticipated that a multi-practice, natural grass practice field would overlap the outfields of the baseball and softball fields.

Would the drainage problems be resolved at both the upper and lower fields?

Yes.

What would happen to the upper, practice field?

The field would be renovated but remain natural grass.

What is a natatorium?

A natatorium is an observation area overlooking a swimming pool.

Why is a natatorium being proposed?

It is a violation of health and safety codes to have swimmers walking on a pool deck where spectators travel wearing street shoes.  The addition of a natatorium would allow spectators to observe pool meets without walking on the pool deck surface.

Would locker rooms be repaired?

Yes.  The current lockers rooms under the gym (boy’s locker rooms and weight rooms) contain numerous code violations, have poor ventilation and tight quarters.  If the referendum for the Renovate-as-New proposal is approved, the existing locker rooms in the lower floor will be completely abandoned and the area will not be accessible for any purpose.  It is anticipated that new locker rooms on the main level will be constructed.

Where would new locker rooms be located?

The women’s locker room would be renovated and new locker rooms would be constructed adjacent to the auxiliary (Girl’s) gym.

What would happen to the boys locker rooms currently located on the lower floor?

The space would be vacated and not accessible.

What renovations would be made to the NHS auditorium if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Any renovations made and/or new equipment installed during the Davis Auditorium Restoration Committee (“DARC”) process would be utilized.  Upgrades to the lighting and sound system and compliance with applicable health, safety and disability codes would be performed if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum.  In addition, it is anticipated that the auditorium’s lobby and entrance/exits points would be enhanced.

Would seating capacity be reduced in the auditorium?

Yes.  Seating capacity would be reduced in the auditorium if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum. Installation of handicapped-accessible seating would decrease the overall, seating capacity of the NHS auditorium. Seating capacity would still remain high for a high school of NHS’s size and accommodate academic specifications.

Would a renovated NHS still be available for use by the community if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum?

Yes.  It is anticipated that the opportunities for use of the NHS building and grounds by the entire community would be significantly enhanced if the NHS Renovate-as-New Project is approved at referendum.

City Hill to Offer Counseling on Sunday

Posted by Bob on September 24, 2011 under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

City Hill Middle School will be open on Sunday, September 25, 2011, from 3:00 PM to 5:30 PM to offer grief counseling to students after this week’s tragic death of a student.  For more details, please see the article on the Naugatuck Patch.

Our family offers our prayers and deepest sympathies to the family of Michael P. Litwinka IV.

Naugatuck Football Rescheduled to Saturday in Waterbury

Posted by Bob on September 23, 2011 under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

Tonight’s (9/23/2011) Naugatuck Greyhound football game against the Derby Red Raiders has been rescheduled to Saturday, September 24, 2011, 10:00 AM, at Municipal Stadium (Snyder Field) in Waterbury.  The contest, originally scheduled to be played at Veteran’s Field, will be another “home” game for the garnet and grey in Waterbury.

Naugatuck High School Tour Schedule Announced

Posted by Bob on September 19, 2011 under Daily Blogs, Naugatuck High School Renovation | Be the First to Comment

Residents wishing to tour Naugatuck High School prior to the November 8, 2011, renovation referendum may do so at the following dates and times:

  • Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 6:30 PM;
  • Wednesday, October 12, 2011, 6:30 PM;
  • Wednesday, October 19, 2011, 6:30 PM (scheduled Parent Conference day);
  • Thursday, October 20, 2011, 6:30 PM (scheduled Parent Conference day);
  • Wednesday, October 26, 2011, 6:30 PM (the Public Hearing will following);
  • Wednesday, November 2, 2011, 6:30 PM; and
  • Monday, November 7, 2011, 6:30 PM.

Tours will be conducted by representatives from Board of Education maintenance staff and/or representatives from Kaestle Boos Associates, Inc.  Administrators will be present for most tours to provide information and answer questions.  The tours will take approximately forty five (45) minutes to one (1) hour.  Additional information will follow is the same becomes available.

Borough and Board of Education Using Same Labor Counsel – 9/7/2011

Posted by Bob on September 7, 2011 under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

During the midst of Hurricane Irene’s aftermath, the Naugatuck Board of Education approved a measure which will engage the law firm of Siegel, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Beck, P.C. (“Siegel O’Connor”), to provide representation on all labor relation and contractual matters.  This change allows one (1) firm to represent both the municipal government and the board of education in all labor negotiations that occur between the two (2) entities, and the ten (10) collective bargaining units (7 – municipal and 3 – Board of Education) representing public employees in Naugatuck.

Siegel O’Connor has represented the Borough in legal matters relating to labor relations for approximately five (5) years spanning three (3) different administrations.  Primarily through representation from Attorney Nicholas J. Grello, Siegel O’Connor has helped the Borough negotiate both short and long term savings in collective bargaining agreements.  In addition, Attorney Grello has worked closely with Borough Director of Human Resources Jeannette Deschesnes to make all aspects of Borough employment more professional and modern.

I commend the members of the Board of Education for their careful thought and diligence in making this decision, which likely will result in savings to taxpayers.  The collective willingness of Board of Education members to explore cost-saving partnerships and collaboration with municipal government is a creative and prudent policy to confront difficult economic times that we all face.

High School Renovate-as-New Presentation – 9/7/2011

Posted by Bob on under Daily Blogs, Naugatuck High School Renovation | Be the First to Comment

The Board of Mayor and Burgesses voted eight (8) to one (1) Tuesday (9/6/2011) night to advance the proposed Naugatuck High School Renovate-as-New Project to public referendum on November 8, 2011.  The PowerPoint presentation made at the meeting can be viewed (in .pdf format) on the Borough’s website (www.naugatuck-ct.gov) by accessing the following link:

http://www.naugatuck-ct.gov/filestorage/77/79/2547/2596/Naugatuck_HS_090611_Powerpoint_from_Kaestle_Boos_97-03_pdf_version_9-7-11.pdf

Kaestle Boos Associates, Inc. has provided a rough estimate of the cost of performing necessary repairs and various code compliance measures and the likely reimbursement rates from the state, which can be viewed here.

Additional information on the project will follow.

Virtual Tour of Naugatuck High School Renovation Proposal – 9/6/2011

Posted by Bob on September 6, 2011 under Daily Blogs, Naugatuck High School Renovation | Be the First to Comment

A virtual tour of the outside building and grounds of the proposed Naugatuck High School Renovation Project is available on the Boroughs website and can be accessed at the following link:

http://www.naugatuck-ct.gov/filestorage/77/79/2547/2596/naugatuck01.wmv

The proposal, which will be discussed in detail at tonight’s (9/6/2011) meeting of the Board of Mayor and Burgesses, would ultimately require approval by Naugatuck voters at referendum.  Additional details discussed at the meeting will be posted in the coming days.

Welcome Back – 9/4/2011

Posted by Bob on September 4, 2011 under Daily Blogs | Be the First to Comment

The server on which www.bobmezzo.com is hosted finally has access to power.  I have had no access to my blog and personal email (bob@bobmezzo.com) since sometime late last Saturday night (8/27/2011) or Sunday (8/28/2011) morning.  I apologize for those that check the site regularly, and hope that you were able to receive information about Hurricane Irene and its aftermath from other electronic sources such as Facebook, Twitter and the Naugatuck Patch.

Specials thanks to Naugatuck Patch Editor Ron DeRosa for allowing me to use Patch so much to convey information during the week-long attempt to restore power to all of the Borough.

If you have sent me an email to bob@bobmezzo.com, I have not received and was not able to reply.  If the subject matter is still pending, please re-send and I will gladly respond.

Thanks for your collective patience during the aftermath of Irene.  The collective strength, courage, compassion and perseverance of Naugatuck residents and businesses is amazing and inspiring.

New blog posts will be available in the coming days.

Switch to our mobile site